Audit prep shouldn't mean reconciling risk and compliance in two different systems

See compliance

In the workspace

A register that survives oversight

  • Risk

    Program and service owners in the workspace

  • Obligations

    Privacy, policy, and audit together

  • Oversight

    Committee views from the live register

Live data

for committees, not an annual freeze

Public Sector · Essentials

Accountable programsnot a filing cabinet

Agencies and public institutions start with the risks to service delivery — then add privacy, policy, and audit obligations on the same workspace.

  • Privacy
  • Audit
  • Policy
  • Service delivery
G2 High Performer Enterprise
G2 Best Support Enterprise
G2 Easiest To Use Enterprise
G2 Easiest Admin Enterprise
G2 Easiest To Do Business With Enterprise

The work

What public sector risk actually has to survive

Accountability is the job. Spreadsheets and shared drives do not survive an auditor, a minister, or a service outage.

01

The register is an annual artifact

Risks are collected for the audit committee, then freeze until the next cycle. Program teams do not live in the document that supposedly describes their work.

02

Privacy, policy, and risk do not share records

Privacy impact assessments, policy inventories, and enterprise risk are three processes. A change in a public-facing system has to be typed three times.

03

Audit findings never update residual risk

Internal audit issues sit in a tracker. The enterprise register still shows the control as effective until someone remembers to edit it.

04

Service delivery risk is invisible until it is public

Outages, backlog, and third-party failures hit residents first. The risk function finds out from the same news cycle as everyone else.

In the workspace

What lives in the workspace

Public accountability as an operating system, not an annual binder.

Program risk with accountable owners

The people who run the service own the risks. Central risk and audit see the roll-up without being the only editors.

Privacy and policy obligations in one place

Requirements sit with the systems and programs they cover, so a change in service design updates both views.

Audit issues that change residual risk

Findings link to controls and risks. Residual scores move when the evidence says they should — not at year end.

Committee reporting from live data

Heat maps, overdue actions, and appetite status are views of the workspace. The pack is not rebuilt from exports.

How Essentials shows up

How Essentials shows up in the public sector

Start with the risks to programs and services. Add privacy, policy, and audit on the same data.

A risk record in Essentials with owners, causes, and controls

Start with program and service risk

  • Give program owners a register they will actually update
  • See residual risk across agencies and programs in one workspace
  • Replace the annual collection with a living set of records
  • Keep risk work usable by the people who run the service
Policies and attestations tracked in Essentials

Add privacy, policy, and audit on the same data

  • Track privacy and policy obligations next to operational risk
  • Map audit findings to the risks and controls they affect
  • Collect evidence without a parallel compliance binder
  • Give risk, privacy, and audit one source of facts
Objectives linked to risk and compliance in Essentials

Connect delivery to oversight

  • Link risks to program objectives and public commitments
  • Give leadership and audit committees views from live data
  • Show where residual risk sits against appetite and mandate
  • Add incidents when you are ready, still on shared data

FAQ

Questions Public Sector teams ask

See Essentials against your public-sector program
We will map it to service delivery risk, privacy, and the oversight cycle you already have.
30 Days

Rapid Implementation

70%

Risk Reduction

100+

Organizations

Recognized by G2 as a Leader

Trusted by customers and rated highly across all categories

Public Sector GRC Software | Essentials